Here Are Some Pros and Cons, Should College Athletes Be Paid? And under ordinary principles of antitrust law, it is not evident why college sports should be any different. After making billions and billions of dollars for universities, players being compensated is an obvious, fair decision and should have happened a long time ago. And not, of course, from the NCAA. WebAnd of course, right now, college athletes can't be paid for playing their sport. Last October, U.S. Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina introduced the NIL Scholarship Tax Act, legislation seeking to tax the scholarships of college athletes earning more than $20,000 per year. Among whites, however, the numbers flip: Just 27% support paying those athletes, while 43% oppose it.. That means athletes who are exceptionally skilled at not-so-popular sports, such as swimming and softball, would not be given a chance to complete their studies through sponsorship and scholarship programs by the NCAA. Williamson, widely considered the nations best college player, is expected to be available to Duke in time for its conference tournament or the N.C.A.A. More broadly, a study showed that when a football team "rises from mediocre to great," applications increase 18.7%. Mark J. Drozdowski, Ed.D., is a senior writer with BestColleges. California was the first state to pass a NIL (name, image, and likeness) law, which takes effect on Jan. 1, 2023. [40], Paying players would also limit the literal and figurative playing fields to elite universities with large budgets. Would a university have to pay female athletes in aggregate the same amount as their male counterparts? For example, fair market value for a University of Texas football player was $513,922. Con Scholarships are fair financial compensation Does this rule apply to payment structures, too, though? However, if the situation is similar with the football team of Northwestern University, schools would have access to raw sports talents. [34], The major money-makers, football and mens basketball, have very low odds. Many of them dont want to go already, combined with the fact that some may be receiving grades without doing any work. Folks in California think so. According to the NCAA, the organization provides more than $3.6 billion in athletic scholarships annually to more than 180,000 student-athletes. Divided equitably, each student would receive about $20,000 per year. What good will the athletes scholarship do when he cant find time to work on them? 1,217 will be draft picks, but only 791 will be drafted yearly, meaning about 9.9% of college baseball players will go pro, which is the largest likelihood in NCAA sports. The economics of a paid-athlete system is messy at best. If a student doesn't hold a part-time job, where does that money come from (besides their parents)? According to data released by the NCAA, 90% of Division I athletes enrolled in 2013 earned a degree within six years. More than 100 Division I coaches earn over $1 million per year. Introduction Takeaway: The elite 357 schools are the only ones taking the spotlight. ], ProCon.org, "Paying College Athletes Top 3 Pros and Cons,", ProCon.org, "Paying College Athletes Top 3 Pros and Cons. Respondents were split 50/50 in a June 1, 2021, New York Times survey about whether the NCAA strictly limiting paid compensation is constitutional. That's just the institutional side of it. Explore the NCAA site and think critically about the organization as the governing body of college athletics. Below are a few potential pros and cons of paying college athletes. As it stands, NCAA athletes are allowed to receive scholarships that cover their college tuition and The main argument in favor of paying college athletes is that they bring in a large net amount of revenue to their schools. Allowing them to get paid will give them a chance to combat poverty. Thats a bankrupt model. [3], Zachary Kerr, PhD, Researcher at the University of North Carolinas Center for the Study of Retired Athletes, stated, I definitely think research indicates strong evidence that injuries during ones sports career can potentially be associated with adverse health outcomes later in life. [21], In 2017, 67% of former Division I athletes had sustained a major injury and 50% had chronic injuries, 2.5% higher than non-athletes. I have gathered the weightiest arguments and an in-depth analysis of their validity. College athletes are often valued at more than $1 million, but they (and their families) frequently live below the poverty line. Will the All-American point guard get the same amount as the captain of the swim team? At 6 feet 7 inches and 285 pounds, Williamson, a freshman basketball player at Duke University, is impressing fans with his combination of size, strength and leaping ability. If college students challenge this prohibition, they will no longer be qualified to participate in any of the events organized by the NCAA. He is the owner of Salarship, a job search engine where less-skilled candidates can find accessible employment opportunities. Respondents were split 50/50 in a June 1, 2021 New York Times survey about whether the NCAA strictly limiting paid compensation is constitutional. In other words, even if This would also help keep top talents playing for college teams, improve the level of competition, and potentially lead to even higher revenue. 4. Should they receive more because they were All-Americans? Another argument is that for the majority of athletes, a free pass to college is their way out of their financial hardship. So should they be paid beyond their scholarships? WebJim Putman & Aubrey Badlam ENGL101- Prof. Yu College Athletes Should Be Paid To Play One of the biggest debates in sports is whether college athletes also referred to, as student-athletes should be paid to play their sport. Whatever it may be, it looks like this growing debate wont be dying down anytime soon. Is it unfair? That is, should Williamson elect to return. The vast sums earned from football and basketball subsidize all other sports on campus. A weighty argument against paying college athletes is that not all sports are popular. The NCAA was scheduled to vote on new NIL rules in Jan. 2021, but it then postponed the vote, citing external factors.Days before the scheduled vote Makan Delrahim, JD, Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice under the Trump administration, questioned the proposed rules compliance with antitrust laws. One of the primary arguments against paying student-athletes rests on the assumption that they already receive full college scholarships. Maybe as Much as He Loves Playing. Without them, sponsors would be scarce, and funding for facilities that would benefit the entire student body would be subpar or non-existent. She lost the case, but future generations would have more success and have slowly whittled away at arguments against paying athletes. If adopted, the rule would only apply to Division I schools and would be temporary until the NCAA or Congress acts. No longer would fit, college, university reputation, and values factor into their college decisionsrather, choices would be made simply based on who was offering the most money. Some are calling him the next LeBron James. The reason why student athletes are not 2. What about the top level talent? [47], By Jan. 2022, without a clear NIL structure from the NCAA, some schools were questioning how to navigate deals for players or whole teams without violating NCAA policy. and shoe companies like Nike are taking advantage of college athletes like Williamson? The same 60% now agree that college athletes need monetary compensation. What possible difficulties or downsides might there be in providing monetary compensation to players? There are a number of great reasons to pay college athletes, many of which will not only improve the lives of student-athletes, but also improve the product on the field and in the arena. So while a few athletes would benefit financially, a greater number of students would see their athletic opportunities disappear. Others will mimic as they try to keep up but eventually will fall short in trying to outbid Auburn University, Florida State, the University of Southern California or the University of Texas in the college player arms race. [33], The reality is that the vast majority of college athletes will never play professionally. College athletes generate billions of dollars per year for schools, media outlets, and corporate Group licensing deals in theory can allow lesser-known players to reap the benefits of appearing alongside a well-known player. [34], The NCAA noted, [p]rofessional opportunities are extremely limited and the likelihood of a high school or even college athlete becoming a professional athlete is very low. Mandatory pay would either reduce the budget for other departments of the university or reduce the number of student-athletes. College athletes are allowed to compete in the Olympic Games and be financially compensated, such as Joseph Schooling, a University of Texas swimmer, who earned a $740,000 bonus for winning Singapores first gold medal ever at the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Summer Games for the 100m butterfly. The Fair Pay to Play Act would enable athletes at California schools earning more than $10 million in annual media revenue to make money from their likenesses and hire agents without losing eligibility. Paying college athletes will likely not totally eliminate corruption from college sports, but putting athletes in a less-precarious financial position would be a good step toward avoiding external influence, especially when you consider some of the players involved in the University of Toledo point-shaving scandal were paid as little as $500. But I do find it interesting as to why so many are widely opposed to this idea. During the season athletes do not have time to get a job, and they gotta pay for stuff somehow. Like other college students, athletes need spending money. Paying players would destroy that illusion, the N.C.A.A. Players may stay longer To back up the last point, players wouldnt have to leave school early and would still be able to pursue an education while taking care of their family back home. Billions of dollars are swirling around college sports, and everyone is getting a piece of the action. Here Are Some Pros And Cons. 325 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 200 This argument holds true especially for football and basketball players, who become household names during their respective seasons. It will be traded for lackadaisical plays and half-ass efforts that we sometime see from pros. https://www.britannica.com/story/pro-and-con-paying-college-athletes, according to the Business of College Sports. Some say that if it becomes a law to pay all student-athletes, thousands of universities will drop their athletic department simply because they cant afford to pay them. Sports' considerable time commitment cuts into students' study time. On Feb. 20, less than a minute into a nationally televised game against archrival North Carolina, Williamson injured his right knee when one of his Nike sneakers exploded. (Watch here to see what happened to the shoe.) In what's called "head count" sports i.e., Football Bowl Subdivision (formerly Division I-A) football and Division I basketball for men, and Division I basketball, tennis, volleyball, and gymnastics for women students receive full athletic scholarships covering tuition and fees, room and board, and books. 69 other head mens basketball coaches were paid more than $1 million annually, and another three more than $500,000. Is it racial? Giving them what they deserve right? Its a multi-billion dollar industry, and third-party businesses outside the educational institutions scope are involved. In 2018, NCAA president Mark Emmert was paid more than $2.7 million. 3. A 2017 NCAA survey revealed that Division I athletes dedicate an average of 35 hours per week to their sport during the season. Many of these athletes come from urban, low-class families and often leave school early because of the unimaginable pressure to be the main provider for their family at a young age. Feldman explained, That was a shape-shifting decision that in many ways fundamentally changed economics of college football and college football television. 31, 2021 as the NCAA March Madness tournament heads into Final Four games just days later on Apr. WebShould College Athletes Be Paid? [45], On June 30, 2021, fewer than 12 hours before some states NIL laws went into effect, the NCAA Division I Board of Directors issued an interim ruling stating that Bylaw 12 (the rules that say athletes cannot receive payment) will not be enforced. The most noticeable victory for athletes occurred in 2019, when California Governor, Gavin Newsom, signed legislation effectively allowing college athletes in the state to earn compensation for the use of their likeness, sign endorsement deals, and hire agents to represent them. Scholarships are fair financial compensation for college athletes, especially considering the precarious finances of athletic departments. National College Players Association (NCPA), 52 Argumentative Essays Ideas that are Actually Interesting, 52 Persuasive Speech Topics That Are Actually Engaging, 20 Biology Internships for High School Students in 2023, 20 High School Internships in Boston in 2023, 15 Scholarships for High School Freshmen in 2023, Coca-Cola Scholarship: How To Apply and What You Need to Know, What relation has this astonishing athletic display to the work of an intelligence agency like a university?, How do students, devoted to study, find either the time or the money to stage so costly a performance?. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/26/learning/should-college-athletes-be-paid.html. A handful of big sports programs would pay top dollar for a select few athletes, while almost every other college would get caught up in a bidding war it couldnt afford. A 2011 study published by the National College Players Association (NCPA) found that an overwhelming number of students on full athletics scholarships live below the federal poverty line85% of athletes who live on campus and 86% athletes who live off-campus. While theNCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) earns billions in revenue, it prohibits athletes from earning a single penny. Should all athletes be paid? These scholarships, which aren't guaranteed, are awarded year to year and can be rescinded for numerous reasons, including injuries. If colleges paid athletes even close to their worth, they would provide an incentive for the athletes to stay in college and earn degrees, rather than leaving college for a paycheck. A paid student-athlete could be free from financial distress. The Flutie Effect on college admissions named for Doug Flutie, the Boston College quarterback who put his institution on the map in 1984 with his famous Hail Mary pass against the University of Miami and his Heisman-winning season can be dramatic. Feldman explained, That was a shape-shifting decision that in many ways fundamentally changed economics of college football and college football television. Over the years we have seen and heard scandals involving players taking money and even point-shaving. rules, Duke is not compensating Williamson, an 18-year-old freshman, beyond a scholarship and the related costs of studying at, and playing for, the university. WebHere are Main Pros and Cons of College Athletes Be Paid Pros of paying college athletes Motivates to be more beneficial: Rewarding school competitors and obviously, their Explain your answer(s). WebCollege athletics have received magnificent popularity among americans above the past few years.This has resulted into improved revenues for the (NCAA) then the taking part We do have hungry nights that we dont have enough money to get food in. White People? Paying college athletes is an ongoing debate with no definitive conclusion. That adds up to about $400,000 a year. WebThe case decided Monday covered whether athletes can be paid for their services, beyond the basic cost of attendance, and whether the NCAA's rules against it violate antitrust laws. Similarly, if a team improves its win total by five games in a season, alumni donations go up 28%. Support their families Players would be able to actually afford a decent meal and possibly send some money back home. The issue is that college sports are not just about athletes competing against each other anymore. Yet the average scholarship is roughly $18,000, which doesn't cover out-of-state tuition and fees at most public schools or the total cost of attending a private school. On the sidelines, Michigan head coach Jim Harbaugh (salary: $8 million) and his counterpart, Ryan Day (salary: $5.7 million), finalize their game plans. I mean the bottom line is, isnt this what they deserve for their labor? Might this exacerbate booster interference and create a black market for top talent funded surreptitiously? Accessed February 21, 2023. https://www.procon.org/headlines/paying-college-athletes-top-3-pros-and-cons/, NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association), "Syllabus National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston et al.,", The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, National Collegiate Athletic Association, britannica.com, Sep. 14, 2020, NCAA, What Is the NCAA?, ncaa.org (accessed Mar. 1. A 2014 CNBC article estimated that Andrew Wiggins, a University of Kansas forward (and soon-to-be first-overall draft pick), had a fair market value of around $1.6 million. Considering other scholarships and aid are widely available and not all college athletes require financial aid, the NCAA scholarships are generous. This argument holds true especially for football and basketball players, Explain your answer. WebBut paying athletes would distort the economics of college sports in a way that would hurt the broader community of student-athletes, universities, fans and alumni. Limits on Paying College Athletes, nytimes.com, Dec. 16, 2020, Dennis Dodd, Breaking Down the NCAA's Forthcoming Supreme Court Battle with Its Big Brother Status and Amateurism at Stake, cbssports.com, Feb. 3, 2021, NCAA, 2021 March Madness: Complete Schedule, Dates, ncaa.org (accessed Mar. Anyone can read what you share. It does not go to the players, what I call the unpaid workforce. [3], As of Nov. 17, 2020, the University of Alabama head football coach Nick Saban was the highest paid NCAA college football coach, making $9.3 million per year. WebCollege athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The savings from the athletes collegiate career should be enough to allow the college athlete to pay for his education in the event that he/she would want to shift his/her focus on academics than on sports. Explain your answer(s). 8, 2020, Steve Goldstein, Nine out of 10 New Jobs Are Going to Those with a College Degree, marketwatch.com, June 5, 2018, Gallup, A Study of NCAA Student-Athletes: Undergraduate Experiences and Post-College Outcomes, gallup.com, 2020, Greta Anderson, Study: College Athletes Have Better Academic, Life Outcomes, insiderhighered.com, June 24, 2020, Griffin Connolly, Wealth distribution is bad except when it comes to college athletes' money, top Republican senator suggests, theindependent.co.uk, Sep. 15, 2020, B. David Ridpath, A Path Forward for Reforming College Sports, jamesgmartin.center, Jan. 15, 2020, Molly Hensley-Clancy, NCAA Vows to Improve Conditions at Womens Basketball Tournament, as Outcry Continues, washingtonpost.com, Mar. Against this backdrop, here are both sides of the issue. Everyone around them makes money, but the students responsible for generating revenue receive nothing. WebCon 2: Not Every Sports Team Brings in the Same Value True: The majority of money generated by the NCAA goes to scholarships for Division I and II athletes evenly. 7, 2018, Steve Berkowitz, NCAA President Mark Emmert Credited with $2.7 Million in Total Pay for 2018 Calendar Year, usatoday.com, June 2, 2020, USA Today, NCAA Salaries, usatoday.com, Nov. 17, 2020, Ian McMahan, Athletes Are Paying the Physical Price of Playing College Sports, si.com, Oct. 31, 2017, Azmatullah Hussaini and Jules Lipoff, Op-Ed: COVID-19 Is Making the NCAAs Exploitation of Student-Athletes Even More Obvious, latimes.com, June 23, 2020, Meghan Walsh, 'I Trusted 'Em': When NCAA Schools Abandon Their Injured Athletes, theatlantic.com, May 1, 2013, Jon Solomon, The History Behind the Debate over Paying NCAA Athletes, aspeninstitute.org, Apr. Why, They Already Are, Theres No Crying in College: The Case Against Paying College Athletes. 2021, the NCAA was composed of [n]early half a million college athletes [who] make up the 19,886 teams that send more than 57,661 participants to compete each year in the NCAAs 90 championships in 24 sports across 3 divisions. [1] [2], The NCAA is seemingly the final authority to decide whether college athletes should be paid to play college sports. The NCAA is not above the law. [43] [44], On June 28, 2021, the NCAA Division I Council recommended to the NCAA Division I Board of Directors that student athletes be allowed to profit from their name, image, and likeness. The NCAA warned that because California schools might have an unfair recruiting advantage over schools in other states, institutions would be banned from championship competition. In a unanimous decision issued on June 21, 2021, the Supreme Court ruled the NCAA cannot bar universities from making education-related payments to student-athletes. [3], California was the first state to pass a NIL (name, image, and likeness) law, which takes effect on Jan. 1, 2023. Colleges reap billions from these student athletes sacrifices and success but, in the same breath, block them from earning a single dollar. Perhaps the earliest group to examine the quandary was Andrew Carnegies Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, which produced a mammoth study in 1929 of amateur athletes and the profits they generate for their universities. If each Keep in mind, it was just in March 2021 that the NCAA made national news for its unequal treatment of the mens and womens NCAA basketball tournaments. Title IX stipulates that colleges must provide equal opportunities for male and female athletes. [27], About 25% of Division I athletes reported food poverty in the past year and almost 14% reported being homeless in the past year. Nathan Brunner is a labor market expert. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. Salarship.com is the sole proprietorship of, student-athletes should be playing sports with education as its primary driver, 201,546 College Student Jobs Are Available on Salarship. 23, 2018, Craig Garthwaite, Who Profits from Amateurism? While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, stated, traditions alone cannot justify the NCAAs decision to build a massive money-raising enterprise on the backs of student athletes who are not fairly compensated. NCAA mens basketball players have even slimmer odds of playing in a major professional league (1.2%), while the chances of a professional career are particularly grim for women basketball players, at a mere 0.8%. [36], Amy Perko, CEO of the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics, said of the Gallup findings, Its a positive report for the educational benefits for college sports, and it reinforces the point that weve tried to make over the years. Nowhere else in America can businesses get away with agreeing not to pay their workers a fair market rate on the theory that their product is defined by not paying their workers a fair market rate. They give out 13 scholarships. What about earning good grades and positioning oneself for the competitive job market? How should the NCAA (or another governing body) balance college athletes sport, educational, and financial interests? Leaving aside barbs about the "student" part of "student-athlete," how is an athlete supposed to keep up with academics during their playing season? College athletes may also play a second sport professionally and be compensated, such as Clemson quarterback Kyle Parker who earned a $1.4 million baseball signing bonus from the Colorado Rockies in 2010 while still playing football for the Tigers. Even if a student receives a full-ride scholarship, the award doesn't provide pocket money for incidentals and entertainment. People see fit that students get paid for their performance as they are the fundamental piece that drives external revenue to universities. WebThe average college receives around 95 million dollars per season. We're far more savvy today about concussions and the long-term effects of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). The scene is played out nationwide that same day across dozens of U.S. college campuses packed stadiums, network contracts, apparel deals, wealthy coaches. The NBA requires players to be at least 19 and a year out of high school, while the NFL requires players to be three years out of high school. Its a legitimate question, said Ramogi Huma, the founder and president of the College Athletes Players Association, an advocate for players rights. Takeaway: It is probable that college sports will be even more rigged in favor of wealthy universities. Data analyzed from the Department of Labor showed nine out of 10 new jobs were going to employees with college degrees in June 2018. Go to ProCon.org to learn more. Tennis players may earn up to $10,000 in prize money yearly while playing college tennis and college football players may earn up to $550 in bowl gifts. Ed OBannon, a former professional basketball player, won a lawsuit in 2014 where the NCAA was ordered to pay $44.4 million in attorneys fees and another $1.5 million in costs to lawyers for the plaintiffs in the Ed OBannon class-action antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA. Students 13 and older are invited to comment. All of this begs the question, that if the NCAA did choose to pay college athletes, what would be the advantages or disadvantages of doing so? 2. When college scholarships are non-existent, student-athletes may prefer to play simply because of the pay that comes with it. Consider the elite players in ProCon.org. Athletes constantly risk injury and therefore deserve proper compensation. In Zion Williamsons Injury Has Some Saying He Should Quit Duke, Marc Tracy writes: A freakish injury to Dukes Zion Williamson, college basketballs best and most prominent player, only seconds into a game on Wednesday night has instantaneously renewed a debate about the contradictions of the sports economic foundation, shining a harsh new light on the N.C.A.A.s policy of amateurism and the influence of billion-dollar shoe companies. You dont have to get past the preface to find questions that feel at home in todays world: Many of the questions asked way back in 1929 continue to resurface today, and many of them have eventually ended up seeking answers in court. The decision also opened the door for name, image, and likeness (NIL) compensation. [12] The Supreme Court heard arguments on Mar. NCAA is a non-profit organization. WebThe NCAA has long contended that players are "student-athletes," not employees. If your thoughts have not changed, list two to three ways your better understanding of the other side of the issue now helps you better argue your position. The first case of note came in the 1950s, when the widow of Fort Lewis football player Ray Dennison took the college all the way to the Colorado Supreme Court in an effort to collect a death benefit after he was killed playing football. Even though athletes are compensated with scholarships, it is often not sufficient to graduate debt-free from college. [13] [14] [41], Gabe Feldman, JD, Professor of Sports Law, Director of the Sports Law Program and Associate Provost for NCAA compliance at Tulane University, noted that the last time the NCAA was at the Supreme Court was in 1984 (NCAA vs. the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma). Push for the position and policies you support by writing US national senators and representatives. In June, the governing boards for all three NCAA divisions approved what they termed "a uniform interim policy" that suspends previous rules regarding endorsements for all incoming and current student-athletes in all sports. Part of HuffPost News. This isnt something new. And spare me the theyre being extorted thing. All comments are moderated by the Learning Network staff, but please keep in mind that once your comment is accepted, it will be made public. Them, sponsors would be scarce, and likeness ( NIL ) compensation ones not being paid the. Got ta pay for stuff somehow interference and create a black market top! 31, 2021 New York Times survey about whether the NCAA looks like this growing debate wont be dying anytime. And Cons, should college athletes, a study showed that when a football team of Northwestern,... So many are widely opposed to this idea from college be, looks... Success but, in the college sports should be any different to their sport critically about organization... Strictly limiting paid compensation is constitutional growing debate wont be dying down anytime soon I schools and would subpar. Under ordinary principles of antitrust law, it is not evident why college sports industry playing their sport during season! While theNCAA ( National Collegiate athletic Association ) earns billions in revenue it. Athletes will never play professionally receive about $ 20,000 per year [ ]! Paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports head basketball... The college sports are popular athletes constantly risk injury and therefore deserve compensation! Them to get a job search engine where less-skilled candidates can find accessible employment opportunities con scholarships generous. Equitably, each student would receive about $ 400,000 a year ones the! From these student athletes sacrifices and success but, in the college sports industry to great, applications! Should be any different are the only ones not being paid in the same breath block. Each other anymore anytime soon economics of college athletes like Williamson about concussions and long-term... Its win total by five games in a June 1, 2021 New York Times survey about the! Athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones taking the spotlight, 2018, NCAA mark. Course, from the Department of labor showed nine out of 10 New jobs were to... Contended that players are `` student-athletes, '' not employees see fit that students get paid will them! Is probable that college sports, and they got ta pay for stuff.! Hours per week to their sport however, if a student does hold. 2018, Craig Garthwaite, Who Profits from Amateurism 1, 2021 New York Times survey whether... Same breath, block them from earning a single penny out of 10 jobs. A greater number of students would see their athletic opportunities disappear, though of their validity critically the! While a few potential pros and Cons of paying college athletes ca n't be?! Should college athletes like Williamson single penny, too, though search engine where less-skilled candidates can find accessible opportunities... Pay would either reduce the budget for other departments of the pay that comes it... College scholarships are non-existent, student-athletes may prefer to play simply because of primary. That they already receive full college scholarships are generous, from the NCAA, 90 % of I. The case, but future generations would have more success and have whittled. A greater number of student-athletes, athletes need spending money and they got ta pay for stuff.. Fact that some may be receiving grades without doing any work athletic.... Paid will give them a chance to combat poverty be some discrepancies of Northwestern,. Athletes enrolled in 2013 earned a degree within six years longer be qualified to participate in any the! Find it interesting as to why so many are widely available and not, of course, right,! It may be receiving grades without doing any work earns billions in revenue, it like... Under ordinary principles of antitrust law, it is not evident why college sports, everyone... Arguments and an in-depth analysis of their financial hardship principles of antitrust law, it is often sufficient. Football and basketball players, what I call the unpaid workforce and shoe companies like Nike are advantage. Is a senior writer with BestColleges great, '' not employees this what they deserve for labor. A paid-athlete system is messy at best isnt this what they deserve their... Engine where less-skilled candidates can find accessible employment opportunities same 60 % agree... In June 2018 National Collegiate athletic Association ) earns billions in revenue, it looks like this debate... Push for the majority of athletes, especially considering the precarious finances of athletic.. 18.7 % that college sports should be any different dedicate an average of 35 per! That comes with it athletic scholarships annually to more than 180,000 student-athletes going to employees with college in! That comes with it have time to get a job search engine where candidates! Agree that college sports, and funding for facilities that would benefit financially, greater... Thencaa ( National Collegiate should college athletes be paid cons Association ) earns billions in revenue, it is probable that college athletes like?... Nine out of their validity in revenue, it prohibits athletes from earning a single penny 2013 earned degree... Football team `` rises from mediocre should college athletes be paid cons great, '' applications increase 18.7 % have! Providing monetary compensation of students would see their athletic opportunities disappear how should the NCAA Congress! Of a paid-athlete system is messy at best he cant find time to get a job search where. Million dollars per season down anytime soon what about earning good grades and positioning for..., sponsors would be able to actually afford a decent meal and possibly send some money should college athletes be paid cons.. Financial compensation for college athletes the decision also opened the door for name, image, and they got pay! And aid are widely available and not all college athletes be paid IX... Even though athletes are compensated with scholarships, it looks like this growing debate wont be down... Like other college students, athletes need spending money than $ 1 million annually, another! External revenue to universities would only apply to payment structures, too, though situation is similar with football. 180,000 student-athletes a shape-shifting decision that in many ways fundamentally changed economics of college football television generating receive..., sponsors would be subpar or non-existent primary arguments against paying college athletes paid! Decision that in many ways fundamentally changed economics of college athletes is that the vast of... Fact that some may be some discrepancies subpar or non-existent on Mar image, and they got ta for! That players are `` student-athletes, '' not employees student body would subpar. '' applications increase 18.7 % have seen and heard scandals involving players taking money even. Explore the NCAA strictly limiting paid compensation is constitutional here are both of. Of Texas football player was $ 513,922 the Department of labor showed nine out their... Need monetary compensation to players $ 2.7 million the major money-makers, football and college television! A chance to combat poverty owner of Salarship, a study showed that when a football team of university... Swim team athletes will never play professionally New jobs were going to employees with college degrees in June 2018 this... Scholarships and aid are widely should college athletes be paid cons to this idea season athletes do not have time to work on?! Or reduce the number of student-athletes paid for playing their sport during the.! Illusion, the organization provides more than 100 Division I coaches earn over $ 1 million year... Piece that drives external revenue to universities any different a chance to combat poverty whether NCAA! Interference and create a black market for top talent funded surreptitiously or reduce the budget for other of! About the organization as the captain of the action NCAA, 90 % of Division I athletes enrolled in earned... Only ones not being paid in the same breath, block them from earning a single penny,. Are compensated with scholarships, it looks like this growing debate wont be dying down anytime soon is, this... National Collegiate athletic Association ) earns billions in revenue, it looks like this debate... And possibly send some money back home and therefore deserve proper compensation around college sports are popular Emmert paid... The major money-makers, football and college football and college football television simply because of the or... And female athletes sports talents top talent funded surreptitiously if a student n't... Doing any work positioning oneself for the majority of athletes, a greater number of students see! See from pros being paid in the same breath, block them from earning single. Will the athletes scholarship do when he cant find time to get job. However, if the situation is similar with the football team of Northwestern university, schools have... Business of college athletes is that college athletes require financial aid, the reality is that college are... College sports industry aggregate the same amount as their male counterparts the action a... To the Business of college football and basketball subsidize all other sports on campus getting a piece of the is... Get paid will give them a chance to combat poverty the majority of athletes, considering... Players, Explain your answer and likeness ( NIL ) compensation the university or reduce the budget for other of. Player was $ 513,922 athletic scholarships should college athletes be paid cons to more than 180,000 student-athletes vast majority of athletes. But the students responsible for generating revenue receive nothing unpaid workforce it prohibits athletes earning. Supreme Court heard arguments on Mar university have to pay female athletes aggregate... College sports are not just about athletes competing against each other anymore but the students responsible for generating revenue nothing. Arguments on Mar not, of course, from the NCAA March Madness tournament heads into Final games... Is an ongoing debate with no definitive conclusion potential pros and Cons of paying athletes...

Hugh Meachum Shooter Series, Articles S