WebMr. v. Imrex Co., Inc.,473 U.S. 479, 496 (1985). Michael Sussman was a victim of retaliation. Res judicata is applicable whenever there is (1) an identity of claims, (2) a final judgment on the merits, and (3) identity of the parties. 73, 76, 78, 80-81, 83-86, 89-90. 1983; United States v. Kama,394 F.3d 1236, 1239-40 (9th Cir. 1983cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights NANCY SUSSMAN AGE 70 NEVER COMMITTED A CRIME IN HER LIFE AND THE D.A. For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion. California. 2003). These are some of the names: World Automotive Financial Services,inc and Lavi International Corporation,. --------. 1367(a). My novel, INCOGNOLIO, was accepted for the Kindle Scout contest and Im See Dkt. at 15. Lived in Corona CA | Mission Viejo CA Related to Michael Sussman | Aaron Sussman | Beth Weinstein | Dana Weinstein | Danielle Sussman. I have not worked since. Buried Here. Buried Here. Code Civ. a narcissistic psychiatrist went slong with the plan and misused mental health legislation law and help by sociopath Seymour Phillips set the rigged conservatorship in to action. at 31-32. Unless your office reviews Sheriff Stein's material and the Coroner's autopsy, pictures, and witness statements you cannot decline a case referred. Plaintiff brings claims against two state agencies, the California Department of Motor Vehicles (the "DMV") and the California Board of Registered Nursing (the "CBRN") based on discrete events unrelated to the prosecution of Mr. Sussman. Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. IT IS SO ORDERED. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO IS CHARGING NANCY SUSSMAN WITH CRIMES NOT COMMITTED TO ASSURE THAT SUMMER STEPHEN DISTRICT ATTORNEY GETS RE-ELECTED AND THAT HER HUSBAND FEDERAL JUDGE DANA SABRAW KEEP UP HIS INVINCIBLE COMPLEX. Id. R. Civ. Join Facebook to connect with Michael Sussman and others you may know. death of Michael Sussman 12/21/2018 dob 5/20/2004 at 31. Plaintiff's Counts I and V appear to allege that Defendants conspired to and did in fact harm Plaintiff and Mr. Sussman by prosecuting and convicting Mr. Sussman, and ultimately causing his death. Plaintiff's claims against the Judicial Defendants, the Prosecutorial Defendants, and the SDPD must be dismissed with prejudice because amendment would be futile. Distinguished Investigator. Sussman appealed to the 9th District based upon judicial misconduct and judge Sidney Thomas backdated his denial of the two judicial conduct complaints to make them look untimely. See Federated Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Moitie,452 U.S. 394, 398 (1981); see also Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp,297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th Cir. al., Defendants. SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- New details about the high speed chase that backed up traffic on Interstate 5 in La Jolla last week. Today, the driver faced a judge. Nancy Sussman is no stranger to the courthouse. Usually, shes representing her clients, but this time shes defending herself against criminal charges that could send her to prison. A former computer crimes prosecutor who worked for the Justice Department for 12 years, Mr. Sussmann in 2016 represented the Democratic National Committee on 2008) (citation omitted). Dr. Joshua Michael Sussman, PhD . See Dkts. at 30-33. Defendant: Francisco Martinez, San Diego Police Dept., US Border Patrol, Jennifer Simone, Ryan Scott, 42 U.S.C. NANCY SUSSMAN, MICHAEL SUSSMAN ESTATE THEREOF BY AND THRU HIS SPECIAL ADMINISTER FOR THE ESTATE, Plaintiff, v. SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et. California. San Diego Police Dept., Ryan Scott, Jeff Jordan, City Attorney Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case. at 18. See Prior Action Dkt. Sussman is a longtime medical malpractice attorney. In court Tuesday, she represented herself. Are you an attorney, the judge asked. The judge entered a not guilty plea on Sussmans behalf. Shes charged with felony evading, driving with a suspended license and resisting arrest. Sussman tried to explain to the judge why she didnt stop. They may think they have won the battle, but we are here to fight the war. 2005) (holding that plaintiff cannot recover under RICO based upon allegations of false imprisonment); Lauter v. Anoufrieva,642 F.Supp. Scripps Mercy Hospital a Catholic hospital for profit in san Diego though he came in too much with a low pay insurance so they decided to get rid of him once and for all. My name is Nancy Sussman. WebBetty Sussman We found 11 records for Betty Sussman in CA, NY and 6 other states. Sussman is a Professor of Music at the University of Massachusetts in Amherst, with former students performing in such professional ensembles as the Singapore Cal. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff brings an unspecified claim against the CBRN, which the Court liberally construes as a claim brought under 1983 (Count XIII).3. Heather Buergen, Esq., Defendant, represented by Corinne Bertsche , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP. Id. 7, 2019); Cal. In addition to being barred by res judicata as discussed above, Plaintiff's RICO claim fails under Rules 8 and 12(b)(6). With respect to DA Stephan, Plaintiff claims she failed to investigate Mr. Sussman's death, initiated criminal proceedings for an improper purpose, conducted "fake" trials, and participated in the District Attorney's illegal policies. 1992). Please call Dr. Sussman for further information or to set up a screening interview. Hon. Accordingly, Counts I and V are dismissed with prejudice. Michael David Sussman Arrest Record Details | Local Crime News in San Diego County, California - 28155366 Search Arrests Arrest Information for Michael David Sussman The following Official Arrest Record for Michael David Sussman is being redistributed by LCN and is protected by constitutional, publishing, and other legal rights. | BillionGraves. Judge Kenneth So wrongfully convicted Michael for crimes he did not commit by not allowing the public to view jury selection, had bailiff beat up Nancy Sussman, changed jury instructions, deleted favorable evidence, sent a fine young man to George Bailey prison for a period of 2 years or he could live in a hotel forever. Plaintiff does not argue on opposition that she made reasonable attempts to serve the SDPD Officers, and there are no proofs of service or other evidence in the record that suggest that attempts were made. In deciding whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, the court should consider the interests of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity. Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678 (citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 556). We know that Tammy Chappell, Tamra Chappell, and two other persons also lived at this address, perhaps within a different time frame. Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions. See Alfonso Martinez v. Nancy Sussman, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Case No. They put him in 3 different rehab facilities, after the completion of the court-ordered drug rehab they recommended that he return home. See Zichko v. Idaho,247 F.3d 1015, 1020 (9th Cir. WebAttorney Nancy Sussman of San Diego; ethical gremlin The state of California presented Nancy Sussman with a law license in 1983 after she graduated from the University of John D Kirby, Defendant, represented by Ashley Walker Nagashima , Walsh McKean Furcolo, LLP. Accordingly, the Court examines whether the Judicial Defendants performed the acts stated in the SAC in their judicial capacity to determine whether Plaintiffs claims are barred by judicial and Eleventh Amendment immunity. California, 03-30-2022. United Mine Workers of Am. WebMichael was a great kid and both families have been completely destroyed by the psychopath court system and the San Diego police department. 1367(c); Sanford v. Member Works, Inc.,625 F.3d 550, 561 (9th Cir. Id. The Defendants described below have moved to dismiss the claims against them. Although Plaintiff appears to claim that CHP Officer Parra's report resulted in the DMV's suspension of her license in 2020, Plaintiff's claim against CHP Officer Parra is otherwise unrelated to her remaining claims. 8, 12-18, 21-22. "A federal court is without personal jurisdiction over a defendant unless the defendant has been served in accordance with Fed. 415.20. Cal. al., Defendants. During Plaintiff's second arrest on October 28, 2019, the SDPD allegedly used "brutal force" and "used unlawful search and seizure to obtain warrant on Sussman." UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The basis of Plaintiff's RICO claim is that Defendants "caus[ed] the death of Michael Sussman," perpetrated "the covert murder of Michael Sussman," and committed "[p]ublic corruption which resulted in death." With respect to Plaintiff's third arrest on December 30, 2019, Plaintiff claims that the SDPD "took Sussman on a wild and reckless police chase in her vehicle based upon a false warrant." 111. WebMs Sussman represented me in a truck auto accident. 2010) ("[I]n the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to be considered under the pendent jurisdiction doctrinejudicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comitywill point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.") City of Chicago v. Int'l College of Surgeons,522 U.S. 156, 172-73 (1997); Smith v. Lenches,263 F.3d 972, 977 (9th Cir. The company is Workers Compensation Appeals Board. denied,142 S.Ct. ECF No. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff's claims against the SDPD Defendants are dismissed. Their names are Carolyn Enders, Joshua Olsen, and 100 others. at 7. 2000)). WebHenry Sussman may also have lived outside of San Diego, such as El Cajon and La Mesa. Here, while it is unclear whether Plaintiff is seeking relief under 1983 or state tort law, under either, Plaintiff does not plead sufficient facts with the requisite plausibility to survive a motion to dismiss. 1995). at 23. Michael Sussman, Estate thereof by and thru his special administer for the estate, Plaintiff, pro se. Leon v. IDX Systems Corp.,464 F.3d 951, 962 (9th Cir. His four children live and/or attend schools in Massachusetts, New York , and North Carolina. Therefore, except for Plaintiff's foregoing claim against ADA Patrick, the Judicial Defendants, the Prosecutorial Defendants, and the SDPD are dismissed with prejudice. Sussman et al v. San Diego Police Dept. As to City Attorney Elliot, she allegedly filed a felony restraining order against Plaintiff. Thus, the Court does not have personal jurisdiction over the SDPD Officers, and the claims against them are dismissed. The State Bar Court found Nancy guilty of engaging in the following misconduct. Plaintiff does not further clarify the contours of this alleged conspiracy. The second element of res judicata is met because Plaintiff's Prior Action was resolved on the merits. For instance, in both actions, Plaintiff challenged Judge So's and Defendant Scott's conduct at Mr. Sussman's trial and alleged that Defendant Elliot and the SDPD helped ensure that Mr. Sussman was convicted. (408) 280-7448 (Pacific Bell), (619) 665-5833 (Sprint Spectrum LPPacific Bell) are the phone numbers for Howard. THEY VIOLATE EMTALAhttps://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/courts/story/2021-08-30/city-attorney-accuses-scripps-health-of-illegally-discharging-gravely-disabled-mentally-ill-patient. Her name is Tammy Rief and her son Jonah Rief. MICHAEL SUSSMAN, Estate thereof by and thru his special administer for the estate and NANCY SUSSMAN: Case Number: 19-56329: Filed: November 18, 2019: Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit: Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights The following is the entirety of Plaintiff's RICO allegations: As seen above, Plaintiff does not properly allege the existence of an enterprise or predicate acts and does not identify cognizable relief. "To seek Rule 60(b) relief during the pendency of an appeal, the proper procedure is to ask the district court whether it wishes to entertain the motion, or to grant it, and then move [the Ninth Circuit], if appropriate, for remand of the case." Do you want corruption? In connection with the same matter, ADA Patrick also allegedly "got on Television to discredit Sussman publically as a witness when she was also the prosecutor." 1060, 1085-86 (C.D. He is a current member of the Avanti Wind Quintet. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that the Judicial Defendants, the Prosecutorial Defendants, the DMV and the CBRN are immune from suit, and the claims against them are dismissed. Rather it must "examine whether conclusory allegations follow from the description of facts as alleged by the plaintiff." Cal. See Prior Action Dkt. 4, 12-13, 23. 110. by Michael in Books, Incognolio, Uncategorized, Writing Tags: Amazon, Contest, Free Book, INCOGNOLIO, Kindle Scout, Novel, Publishing Contract. Nearly all of Plaintiff's allegations concerning the Prosecutorial Defendants involve prosecutorial acts closely tied to the initiation and presentation of state prosecutions. WE NEED BRITNEY TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST CORRUPT GOVERNMENTAL CONSERVATORSHIP. Call for connection for LA CalBar Court. "Once service is challenged, plaintiff[] bear[s] the burden of establishing that service was valid under Rule 4." Your office has no jurisdiction to decline this case without review of the materials Sheriff Stein wanted to give your office and then meet the witness and interview the Sheriff which was not done. Cahill v. Liberty Mut. State bar hearing proceeding on CalBar via Zoom, Bar #108689, The public is invited! Finally, with respect to former Deputy City Attorney Scott, Plaintiff primarily contends that he granted a witness immunity, and that the witness ultimately committed perjury. Please contact or have an assistant D.A. Dana M. Sabraw United States District SAC at 4, 12-15, 23. Gov. Plaintiff states that she was in a car accident on August 17, 2019, that resulted from the other driver's negligence. His main focus is on using translational approaches to understand disease pathology. Adam J Sussman and Adam Jay Sussman are some of the alias or nicknames that Adam has used. 1367(c). For the reasons set out above, the Court grants Defendants' motions to dismiss [Dkts. 37-2016-00045136-CU-HRCTL; SAC at 6, 9, 16-17. The Court agrees with Defendants that Plaintiff "did not properly serve the individually named Defendants under California law or Federal law." Plaintiff also alleges that the Martinez couple and two other neighbors, Joel and Mary Johnson, sent defamatory complaints to the CBRN that "Sussman as `crazy' mentally Ill' under arrest, in jail etc. Even where supplemental jurisdiction exists, the Court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction if "(1) the claim raises a novel or complex issue of state law; (2) the claim substantially predominates over the claim or claims over which the district court has original jurisdiction; (3) the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction; or (4) in exceptional circumstances, there are other compelling reasons for declining jurisdiction." Michael was a kind, smart person who would give anyone the shirt off his back. Williams v. Woodford, 384 F.3d 567, 586 (9th Cir. 19cv1063 DMS (JLB) (the "Prior Action"). Moreover, as discussed above, Plaintiff's Count I and V based on the conspiracy against her son are barred by res judicata, making amendment futile, and thus Counts I and V are dismissed with prejudice. Michael Sussman was SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. NANCY SUSSMAN and MICHAEL SUSSMAN, Plaintiffs, v. SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. Id. We found 15 records for Michael Sussman in CA, MI and 9 other states. On November 4, 2019, the District Court dismissed Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint with prejudice. Id. See Prior Action Dkts. Plaintiff: Nancy Sussman and Michael Sussman. The admitted year is 1986-12-11. Cal. United States District Court, S.D. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency,322 F.3d 1064, 1077 (9th Cir. at 15. The City attorney charged him with false charges, false restraining orders and prohibit him from seeing his mother which was not warranted by her. PeopleFinders is the best people search for finding people and public records. Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. SAC at 9, 28-29. Michael was charged with 18 bogus stacked on misdemeanors. Plaintiff's remaining state law claims are dismissed for lack of supplemental jurisdiction. Cause: 42 U.S.C. He is the Principal Clarinetist of the Springfield (MA) Symphony Orchestra, and has served as Principal Clarinetist with the orchestras of the Bolshoi Ballet, Orpheus Chamber Orchestra, Royal Ballet, Stuttgart Ballet, D'Oyly Carte Opera, West Australian Symphony Orchestra, Australian Opera, Australian Ballet, Teton Festival Orchestra, Radio City Music Hall Orchestra, Handel and Haydn Society, Brooklyn Philharmonic, the Goldman Band, the New Hampshire Symphony, and the Monadnock Music Festival. Id. San Diego, USA. Full title:NANCY SUSSMAN and MICHAEL SUSSMAN, Plaintiffs, v. SAN DIEGO POLICE, Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Hebbe v. Pliler,627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th Cir. A more recent docket listing Plaintiff, who used to be an attorney, also appears to contend that Judge Pollack retaliated against her when he reported her conduct to the State Bar of California. Plaintiff also brings claims against the SDPD Defendants based on three arrests unrelated to Mr. Sussman's prosecution. Nor can Plaintiff argue that the SDPD is a proper Defendant based on Plaintiff's factual allegations concerning discrete arrests and the SDPD's alleged involvement in her son's conviction and trial. In yet another incident, unspecified persons purportedly "hired" Defendant Alfonso Martinez "to spy on the Sussman with 24/7 cameras from his roof and report all activities to them for entrapment purposes and instructed him to video tape the Sussman's and easedrop on them 24/7 and report activities to the SDPD so he could testify against the Sussman's with immunity." Jennifer Simone, Probation Officer, Defendant, represented by Melissa Maria Holmes , County of San Diego Office of County Counsel. v. et al, Francisco Martinez, San Diego Police Dept., US Border Patrol, Jennifer Simone, Ryan Scott, Gregory Garrison, Mara Elliot, John D Kirby, Heather Buergen, Esq., City Attorney Office, Charley Khoury, Judge Kenneth So, DOES 1-50, Jeff Jordan, Michael Pancer, Michael McCabe, Alfonso Martinez, Harbor Police, Grethen Helm Ronas, Franciso Martinez, The US Border Patrol, Medical examiners office and A.P. UMass Amherst, Amherst College, Smith College, Hampshire College, Mount Holyoke. Jes Solar Co. Ltd. v. Tong Soo Chung, 725 F. App'x 467, 469-70 (9th Cir. The admitted year is 1986-12-11. 05 Aug 2017 Leave a Comment. I had a collar bone break and a broken femer. The address is 4720 Lincoln Blvd 2nd Fl, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292. Plaintiff brings claims against the SDPD and certain individually named SDPD Officers (the "SDPD Defendants") as members of an alleged conspiracy to prosecute Mr. Sussman. Plaintiff Nancy Sussman's son, Michael Sussman, was convicted in San Diego Superior Court for a variety of misdemeanors related to a domestic violence incident and was given a one-year sentence. 31 Mar 2017 Leave a Comment. We are here to give Michael a voice. A motion to dismiss should be granted if a plaintiff's complaint fails to contain "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Because the Court has dismissed all of Plaintiff's federal claimsthe claims that conferred original jurisdictionthe Court need not exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining unrelated state law claims. The Committee to Expose Dishonest and Incompetent Judges, Attorneys and Public Officials, Powered by, The Committee to Expose Dishonest and Incompetent Judges, Attorneys and Public Officials, Attorney Nancy Sussman of San Diego; ethical gremlin. 279 Fine Arts CenterUniversity of MassachusettsAmherst, MA 01003Tel:413-545-4776. Find Reviews, Ratings, Directions, Business Hours, Contact Information and book online appointment. Therefore, these acts cannot form a basis for liability. Lab'y,131 F.3d 836, 839 (9th Cir. Lund v. Cowan,5 F.4th 964, 969 (9th Cir. Plaintiff's only allegations against the Prosecutorial Defendants not covered by prosecutorial immunity is that ADA Patrick made statements to the press. The Court, therefore, lacks jurisdiction to entertain Plaintiff's motion and it is accordingly denied. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/courts/story/2021-08-30/city-attorney-accuses-scripps-health-of-illegally-discharging-gravely-disabled-mentally-ill-patient, https://www.kusi.com/families-of-murdered-girls-sound-off-on-san-diego-countys-district-attorneys-race/ AND https://sandiegofreepress.org/2018/10/district-attorney-summer-stephan-must-apologize-to-san-diegos-jewish-community/#.YYr3a2DMKM8 AND http://www.recalldastephan.com/. 28 U.S.C. Cal. After the first suspension, Plaintiff "demanded of the DMV the suspension be removed it was not." This order dismisses those Defendants on other grounds set forth in sections II.A and II.C-D.). It will be sent to The California State House, The California State Senate, and 3 others. The Eleventh Amendment prohibits suits by private parties against a state or state agency unless one of three exceptions applies: (1) the state has expressly waived its right not to be sued, (2) Congress has specifically passed a law allowing suit, or (3) a party seeks prospective injunctive relief for an ongoing violation of federal law under the Ex Parte Young doctrine. Very caring person. Vehicle Code 1500. Any attempt by Plaintiff to replead these claims based on the same transactional nucleus of factsthe prosecution, conviction, and death of Mr. Sussmanwould necessarily require dismissal on the same res judicata grounds. 2001). | BillionGraves. To state a claim for a RICO violation, a plaintiff must allege: "(1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering activity." Based on the above, Plaintiff brings the following claims against Defendants Alfonso and Esperanza Martinez and Joel and Mary Johnson: RICO (Count V); an unspecified claim that the Court construes as defamation (Count XIII); and interference with prospective economic advantages (Count XIV). WebHenry was born on October 24, 1917 and passed away on Friday, April 3, 2009.. Henry was a resident of San Diego, California. STAY TUNED!!! Dkts. Similarly, except for Plaintiff's claim against ADA Patrick based on her statements to the press, Plaintiff cannot cure her claims against the Prosecutorial Defendants because they are absolutely barred by prosecutorial immunity. Judge Kenneth So, Defendant, represented by Matthew L. Green , Best Best and Krieger LLP. Nor does Plaintiff identify any predicate acts, let alone a pattern of racketeering activity. Tahoe-Sierra, 322 F.3d at 1078 (citation omitted). Hon. Judge Pollack, Judge So, and Michael's own attorneys as well that equaled collusion and corruption. Sussman's are being ostracized. Proc. v. San Diego Police Dept., et al., Case No. 2009) (affirming dismissal with prejudice of improperly named defendant). Judges are "immune from damage actions for judicial acts taken within the jurisdiction of their courts." Id. Lawrence v. Krahne, 698 F. App'x 504, 504 (9th Cir. 2017) (citation omitted). Thus, the third element of res judicata is clearly met as to Counts I and V against these Defendants. Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. Check reviews, hours, insurance options, & book your appointment today. Based on the above, Plaintiff alleges the following claims against the Judicial Defendants: (1) violations of unspecified rights under 1983 (Count I); (2) abuse of process (Count H); (3) RICO (Count V); (4) interference with a federal lawsuit (Count VIII); and (5) interference with prospective economic advantages (Count XIV).1. Shortly after being released from jail, Mr. Sussman died of a drug overdose. Michael McCabe, Defendant, represented by Craig Joseph Leff , Law Offices of Craig Joseph Leff. Former Deputy City Attorney Scott also allegedly sent defamatory letters to the Certified Board of Registered Nursing, along with Defendants Alfonso and Esperanza Martinez and Joel and Mary Johnson, reporting "Sussman as `crazy' mentally Ill' under arrest, in jail etc. 28 U.S.C. WebINCOGNOLIO Pre-Orders Go Live! WebUC San Diego Health. A court, however, need not accept all conclusory allegations as true. Id. Thus, Plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed. Plaintiff brings a claim against Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company ("Allstate") based on an insurance dispute that is unrelated to the rest of her claims. One of the best Lawyers, Legal business at 1901 1st Ave, San Diego CA, 92101 United States. There, Plaintiff alleged a conspiracy to wrongfully convict Mr. Sussman, and ultimately cause his death. On June 6, 2019, Plaintiff filed suit alleging a conspiracy to falsely prosecute and convict her son, Mr. Sussman. Early Career Investigator . Plaintiff contends, as she did in the Prior Action, that Judge So unfairly presided over the criminal trial of Mr. Sussman, which resulted in Mr. Sussman's "fake conviction" and death. Plaintiff brings claims against Prime Healthcare Paradise Valley, LLC dba Paradise Valley Hospital ("Paradise") and Dr. Prakash Bhatia based on her involuntary psychiatric confinement, unrelated to the rest of her claims. 509 U.S. at 277-78. Id. Id. Pro se complaints are "held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers." Rule 12(b)(6) is read in conjunction with Rule 8(a), which requires only "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief."

Tallest 11 Year Old Female, Articles M